TPG TECHNOLOGIES

Technology Readiness Canvas

A living evidence, risk and validation map for TPG flagship platforms.

Readiness is recalculated from the weighted milestone plan whenever a project is updated. Results are planning indicators, not independent certification or formal TRL ratings.

View TPG Ecosystem →
OHE-CLUSTER™ / OES-SST™ 28% Evidence building EEB-nZET™ 31% Evidence building EEV-nZES™ 28% Evidence building DBV-MRJ™ 25% Evidence building

OHE-CLUSTER™ / OES-SST™

Flagship

Ocean Infrastructure Platform

Architecture and testable claims are defined; analytical and numerical evidence are being organized before subsystem and independent integrated testing.

28% Evidence building
Concept100%
100%
Evidence28%
28%
Independent validation0%
0%
Commercial readiness0%
0%

Current focus

Hydrodynamic response, energy conversion, hyper relative-motion accounting, marine survivability and scale-up.

Next milestone

Hydrodynamic response model

Evidence and milestones
  1. Complete
    Testable system claim definedConcept · 5/5

    HFS, hyper gear, PTO and soft-mooring claims separated

  2. Complete
    Architecture boundaries documentedConcept · 3/5

    Energy, water and hydrogen outputs scoped

  3. In Progress
    Hydrodynamic response modelEvidence · 5/5

    Map HFS response across the target wave spectrum

  4. In Progress
    Energy balance modelEvidence · 5/5

    Force–velocity–efficiency accounting for the hyper mechanism

  5. Planned
    Hyper gear bench testEvidence · 4/5

    Kinematics and measured mechanical losses

  6. Planned
    PTO bench testEvidence · 4/5

    Pressure, flow and conversion-efficiency map

  7. Planned
    Integrated tank testIndependent validation · 5/5

    Independent hydrodynamic and PTO test

  8. Planned
    Structural and fatigue reviewIndependent validation · 5/5

    Extreme load and multi-cycle envelope

  9. Planned
    Scale-up and capital planCommercial readiness · 3/5

    Prototype work package and cost envelope

  10. Planned
    Validation partner intakeCommercial readiness · 4/5

    TNO or Fraunhofer scope and quotation

Risks and blind spots
  • Energy balance across force, velocity and efficiency
  • Hydrodynamic performance across the target wave spectrum
  • Fatigue across millions of cycles
  • Corrosion, tribology, fouling and lubrication at the seawater interface
  • Extreme-wave survival mode
  • Prototype-to-full-scale similarity and PTO scaling
Validation pathway
  1. WP1 — Hydrodynamic validation: CFD and tank testing
  2. WP2 — Hyper gear dynamics: kinematics, force transmission and loss map
  3. WP3 — PTO validation: pressure, flow and output map
  4. WP4 — Structural, fatigue and marine interface review
  5. WP5 — Independent integrated TRL-gate test with TNO or Fraunhofer
Updated 3 Sep 2026

EEB-nZET™

Flagship

Near-Zero-Emission City Transit

The Extended-EV platform and city-transit application are defined; duty-cycle evidence and defensible near-zero energy/carbon accounting are the immediate gates.

31% Evidence building
Concept100%
100%
Evidence36%
36%
Independent validation0%
0%
Commercial readiness0%
0%

Current focus

Extended-EV architecture, high-utilization duty cycle, system efficiency, vehicle integration and homologation.

Next milestone

Duty-cycle energy-flow model

Evidence and milestones
  1. Complete
    Extended-EV platform architecture definedConcept · 5/5

    OCE, OCC, PTN and KTC system boundary

  2. Complete
    EEB-nZET application definedConcept · 3/5

    Near-zero-emission city-transit use case

  3. In Progress
    Duty-cycle energy-flow modelEvidence · 5/5

    Representative high-utilization urban routes

  4. In Progress
    Near-zero carbon accountingEvidence · 5/5

    Define fuel, electricity and emissions boundary

  5. Planned
    Core subsystem bench programmeEvidence · 4/5

    Measured efficiency, control and thermal behaviour

  6. Planned
    Vehicle integration reviewIndependent validation · 5/5

    Packaging, safety and duty-cycle verification

  7. Planned
    Homologation pathwayIndependent validation · 5/5

    Applicable vehicle and emissions requirements

  8. Planned
    Transit operator discoveryCommercial readiness · 4/5

    Confirm priority use cases and acceptance criteria

  9. Planned
    OEM and licensing pathwayCommercial readiness · 4/5

    Integration responsibilities and commercial model

Risks and blind spots
  • Near-zero claim requires explicit well-to-wheel boundaries
  • Energy and thermal balance under real bus duty cycles
  • Packaging and subsystem integration
  • Durability under high-utilization fleet operation
  • Vehicle homologation and safety case
  • Transit-operator adoption and OEM integration model
Validation pathway
  1. Define system boundary and measurable performance claims
  2. Model representative urban transit duty cycles
  3. Bench-test core OCE, KTC, PTN and OCC functions
  4. Complete vehicle integration and safety review
  5. Validate with an independent engineering partner
  6. Run an operator/OEM demonstration and licensing assessment
Updated 3 Sep 2026

EEV-nZES™

Flagship

Near-Zero-Emission Cargo Ship

The marine application is positioned as a propulsion platform rather than a new ship; energy-flow, class and integration evidence remain to be built.

28% Evidence building
Concept100%
100%
Evidence25%
25%
Independent validation0%
0%
Commercial readiness0%
0%

Current focus

Marine propulsion and fuel architecture, vessel duty cycle, class/regulatory pathway, shipyard integration and sea validation.

Next milestone

Vessel duty-cycle model

Evidence and milestones
  1. Complete
    Marine platform use case definedConcept · 5/5

    Cargo vessel propulsion platform, not ship manufacturing

  2. Complete
    Reference architecture boundedConcept · 3/5

    Propulsion, fuel and energy-management interfaces

  3. In Progress
    Vessel duty-cycle modelEvidence · 5/5

    Energy flow across port, coastal and cruise conditions

  4. Planned
    Propulsion subsystem bench testEvidence · 5/5

    Efficiency, thermal and transient response map

  5. Planned
    Class pre-assessmentIndependent validation · 5/5

    Safety, fuel and machinery-rule gap analysis

  6. Planned
    Harbour demonstrationIndependent validation · 5/5

    Integrated propulsion and controls validation

  7. Planned
    Sea-trial programmeIndependent validation · 5/5

    Independent performance and reliability evidence

  8. Planned
    Shipyard/OEM integration partnerCommercial readiness · 4/5

    Confirm interfaces, cost and responsibilities

  9. Planned
    Fleet business caseCommercial readiness · 3/5

    Retrofit or new-build economics

Risks and blind spots
  • Vessel-level energy and emissions boundary
  • Class, flag-state and IMO regulatory pathway
  • Fuel storage and marine safety architecture
  • Shipyard packaging and retrofit downtime
  • Durability, corrosion and maintainability
  • Capital intensity of demonstration and sea trials
Validation pathway
  1. Select one reference vessel and duty cycle
  2. Complete vessel energy and emissions model
  3. Bench-test propulsion and energy-management subsystems
  4. Conduct class and regulatory pre-assessment
  5. Integrate with a shipyard or marine OEM partner
  6. Complete harbour and sea-trial validation
Updated 3 Sep 2026

DBV-MRJ™

Flagship

Dual Burner Venturi – Multi Regime Jet

The physics-led deep-tech proposition is defined; multi-regime flow, combustion stability and performance claims require numerical, bench and independent evidence.

25% Evidence building
Concept100%
100%
Evidence18%
18%
Independent validation0%
0%
Commercial readiness0%
0%

Current focus

Multi-regime fluid dynamics, Venturi entrainment, steam-assisted combustion, stability, thrust/efficiency and operating envelope.

Next milestone

Coupled flow model

Evidence and milestones
  1. Complete
    Core physics claim definedConcept · 5/5

    Multi-regime flow, Venturi entrainment and steam assistance separated

  2. Complete
    Platform positioning definedConcept · 3/5

    Deep-tech propulsion and high-energy-flow platform

  3. In Progress
    Coupled flow modelEvidence · 5/5

    Regime map, transition conditions and momentum accounting

  4. Planned
    Cold-flow bench testEvidence · 4/5

    Entrainment, pressure field and losses

  5. Planned
    Combustion bench testEvidence · 5/5

    Stability, steam ratio, efficiency and emissions

  6. Planned
    Independent operating-envelope testIndependent validation · 5/5

    Third-party verification of regimes and performance

  7. Planned
    Thermal and durability reviewIndependent validation · 4/5

    Materials, control and safety boundaries

  8. Planned
    Lead application selectionCommercial readiness · 3/5

    Choose the first industrial or propulsion demonstrator

  9. Planned
    OEM validation pathwayCommercial readiness · 4/5

    Test scope, integration route and commercial model

Risks and blind spots
  • Operating regimes and transition mechanism must be explicit
  • Momentum, energy and pressure-loss accounting
  • Combustion stability and controllability
  • NOx, CO and fuel-efficiency performance
  • Thermal stress, materials and durability
  • Application selection without diluting the core physics claim
Validation pathway
  1. Define falsifiable multi-regime flow claims and metrics
  2. Complete coupled CFD and thermodynamic analysis
  3. Bench-test cold-flow entrainment and pressure fields
  4. Bench-test combustion, steam ratio and emissions
  5. Map the safe operating envelope independently
  6. Select one industrial or propulsion demonstrator with an OEM partner